BuffMarsters
Townie
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2017
- Messages
- 42
- Age
- 44
I’m kind of on the fence about this because I have mixed feelings about both Angel and Spike.
I feel like there’s a difference between having chemistry with someone, and them being well matched for you in terms of personality, behaviour and the way they interact with you. Now having said that, as an individual, I find Spike more interesting than Angel. I don’t hate Angel or anything. He’s just a bit too stoic and serious for my liking. But just because I like Spike more as a singleton, doesn’t mean that I like him when he’s with Buffy.
I thought that Spike and Buffy definitely had some romantic potential. They had a mild bit of heat and chemistry going in the early seasons. It was a spark that I could see turning into a flame. But the way there relationship played out was a huge disappoint me (Kinda like how I feel about Elena and Damon in TVD). Buffy brought out the good in Spike, but being with Spike turned Buffy into a whole new person. To be honest, I don’t even know if Buffy ‘felt’ like Buffy anymore. It’s like she became this whole other person.
Now Angel on the other hand. When Buffy was with him him, she always seemed like the Buffy I know and love. And even though I find Angel boring, I feel like Angel and Buffy were well suited for each other. They didn’t have a ton of chemistry, but it felt like they were a good team and that they balanced each other out. I imagine that if Angel and Buffy had got married, they would have lasted for a lifetime. angel would have been a good husband and a good father (as long as that pesky Angelus thing didn’t get in the way, obviously). Now if Spike and Buffy got married, I imagine they would have ended up having a messy and lengthy divorce (and a fierce custody battle if kids were involved).
Of course, some of you might disagree with me. I know Spike fans are a pretty vocal bunch. This is the video I watched, which got me thinking about the topic (it’s pro spike, in case you were wondering).
I feel like there’s a difference between having chemistry with someone, and them being well matched for you in terms of personality, behaviour and the way they interact with you. Now having said that, as an individual, I find Spike more interesting than Angel. I don’t hate Angel or anything. He’s just a bit too stoic and serious for my liking. But just because I like Spike more as a singleton, doesn’t mean that I like him when he’s with Buffy.
I thought that Spike and Buffy definitely had some romantic potential. They had a mild bit of heat and chemistry going in the early seasons. It was a spark that I could see turning into a flame. But the way there relationship played out was a huge disappoint me (Kinda like how I feel about Elena and Damon in TVD). Buffy brought out the good in Spike, but being with Spike turned Buffy into a whole new person. To be honest, I don’t even know if Buffy ‘felt’ like Buffy anymore. It’s like she became this whole other person.
Now Angel on the other hand. When Buffy was with him him, she always seemed like the Buffy I know and love. And even though I find Angel boring, I feel like Angel and Buffy were well suited for each other. They didn’t have a ton of chemistry, but it felt like they were a good team and that they balanced each other out. I imagine that if Angel and Buffy had got married, they would have lasted for a lifetime. angel would have been a good husband and a good father (as long as that pesky Angelus thing didn’t get in the way, obviously). Now if Spike and Buffy got married, I imagine they would have ended up having a messy and lengthy divorce (and a fierce custody battle if kids were involved).
Of course, some of you might disagree with me. I know Spike fans are a pretty vocal bunch. This is the video I watched, which got me thinking about the topic (it’s pro spike, in case you were wondering).