KaitKat
Scooby
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2021
- Messages
- 510
- Age
- 34
I was watching Shells for the first time in awhile today and was wondering if anyone else thinks Giles is out of character? If you agree that he is do you think it’s simply to serve the plot or do you think it fits into the larger theme of Season 5?
We all know that during crossover episodes the characterizations aren’t always perfect but Giles refusing to help Angel save Fred seems wildly out of character to me. He at one point was willing to sacrifice both Dawn and Spike for the fate of the world now he won’t help one girl to save it simply to draw hard lines with Angel. From the emotional aspect that we as viewers see he seems cruel for not helping a beloved character but putting that aside and looking at it logically like Watchers and historically Giles are supposed to do Illyria is dangerous, could easily destroy the world and needs to be stopped. Do you agree that Giles was wrong not to help or do you think he was right to keep his people as far away from Wolfram and Hart as possible?
If you agree that Giles was out of character do you think that it was simply done so that it would be easy to explain why there isn’t an army of Slayers to help in Not Fade Away? Or do you think that it fits in with the themes of Season 5? In Season 5 we explore if our heros can change Wolfram and Hart or if Wolfram and Hart will change our characters, can the same be said about Giles and the Council? Watching this episode I’m reminded of The Zeppo where the council won’t share vital information with Giles about the Hellmouth opening despite the potential consequences to draw a hard line with Giles, is Giles doing the same thing? Did he become Quinten Travers when he took over his position?
If you think it is in character for Giles do you think he is looking at the large picture or is he simply glad the Angel and Spike are both out of Buffy’s life and wants to keep it that way?
We all know that during crossover episodes the characterizations aren’t always perfect but Giles refusing to help Angel save Fred seems wildly out of character to me. He at one point was willing to sacrifice both Dawn and Spike for the fate of the world now he won’t help one girl to save it simply to draw hard lines with Angel. From the emotional aspect that we as viewers see he seems cruel for not helping a beloved character but putting that aside and looking at it logically like Watchers and historically Giles are supposed to do Illyria is dangerous, could easily destroy the world and needs to be stopped. Do you agree that Giles was wrong not to help or do you think he was right to keep his people as far away from Wolfram and Hart as possible?
If you agree that Giles was out of character do you think that it was simply done so that it would be easy to explain why there isn’t an army of Slayers to help in Not Fade Away? Or do you think that it fits in with the themes of Season 5? In Season 5 we explore if our heros can change Wolfram and Hart or if Wolfram and Hart will change our characters, can the same be said about Giles and the Council? Watching this episode I’m reminded of The Zeppo where the council won’t share vital information with Giles about the Hellmouth opening despite the potential consequences to draw a hard line with Giles, is Giles doing the same thing? Did he become Quinten Travers when he took over his position?
If you think it is in character for Giles do you think he is looking at the large picture or is he simply glad the Angel and Spike are both out of Buffy’s life and wants to keep it that way?