Discussion of Buffy 11.12 - Released 10/25/17 (Dark Horse)

perhaps the story had been hashed out when the writers thought Hillary was going to win the presidency

The embryonic beginnings of that storyline were put down in S7. 7 alluded to new ways of thinking "otherness" that couldn't be sustained by available social formations. Its logic is traceable throughout the comics - through the shift (which started in 6/7) from humanism through the post/trans humanism of S9 etc. I don't know why Preston feels the need to be an apologist - the main thrust of the comics makes perfect sense to me. So yes - the political climate in the US is pertinent but I don't think it was "hashed". I think it was predictable (both from the comics and inferable from the philosophy of historicism/dialectical materialism (and that sentence bored even me🙁). In their basic assumptions, texts make political commentary (even when they're not making political commentary). The Harmony reference - TBH, I expected her and Clem to appear but, on reflection, the significance is in her name and the notion of multicultural integration - non-demonization of the other etc. The sly aside to Hamilton was genius. 😀In addition, Preston he had a rant last time about Wise and missed the point that "Press Secretary" doesn't need a character - it's the post that's important. It has a function independent of who is inhabiting the role (particularly pertinent today because of the fake news/MSM furore we've been immersed in). He seems to ignore the biblical/mythic structures that have always underpinned meaning in BtVS. In all honesty, I think some of the readings above (e.g @Stoney and @nmcil12 - apologies if I've missed others) were far more nuanced and insightful than Preston's (and I usually like Buffington). 🙂

Question - what do folk think of the chances of a BtVS / Angel crossover? I ask because I wasn't sure that dragon went of its own volition - it looked somewhat distracted - as though someone had called it back. And Buffy's hair - obviously not a fashion decision but it does sort of intimate two Buffys. Preston was right when he called it hybrid.

I need to say a word about Angel 11 here (without turning it into the interminable Spuffy/Bangel debate). 😱 I don't read his situation as OOC nor as character assassination (I thought the same of Twilight). He's catholic isn't he? And he's been berating himself for goodness knows how many years about forgiveness? Then he gets an indication from a God that he's lovable? I don't want to say too much because I'm speculating but I actually read it as potentially redemptive. As far as I'm aware there are three stages in the forgiveness of post-baptism sin - penance, confession, and reconciliation. I haven't read all of S11 but my understanding from the first few instalments was that he'd started what could be deemed a therapeutic journey. Has the middle stage been confessional? We've seen a slow transformation in Illyria - perhaps from an "old testament god" to a "new testament god" (or a more secular equivalent)? I always thought OT/NT was suggested in 7 (Buffy as First/Caleb mirroring Buffy/Spike). Is it alluding to a Trinity - Father, Son and Holy Spirit has a certain logic to it. I don't know - I don't know anything (I've followed the structure of Spike's story more closely than Angel's) except I certainly wouldn't write him off yet. If Buffy 11-12 wasS7 revisited are we looking at Angel 11 as A5 revisited - or is this to come?

Most significantly - Illiyria is blue and - I'll be honest - I still want more of the blue fairy!🙂 I need the Pinocchio references to play out. More so since Buffy tries to pacify the dragon as one would a dog and, in the original novel Geppetto (or JOseph) is swallowed by a giant Dogfish. I'm quite intrigued by the similarity between some of the illustrations in both comics and Enrico Mazzanti illustrations of the 1886(?) novel.

There's a lot of overlap between Buffy and Spike that I like - very reminiscent of the conscious/unconscious mutuality of S7.

Drawing together for a common goal but not actually bridging the divide fully works with the greys but doesn't ignore that there are definite breaks/differences still there.
I think this is important. The elision of difference would be an illusion and the failure to address contradictions would be a dangerous illusion - it leads to the situation we had with Twilight (a premature utopianism or wish fulfilment without addressing the source of the wish). I think it's important that history moves in small increments and sometimes goes sideways! @Priceless - thoughts on the spiral stair case. Stairs seem to be your thing (I indulged in a Third Man moment with it but it got me nowhere!). Spike's hands took me back to Dana and I feel there's some significance to them in the penultimate frame. I also wondered about the autonomous hand of the mummy (Priceless - put the knitting needles down!🙂).That said - @GoSpuffy 's reminder of the end of Chosen was timely (and I'm berating myself for missing the blindingly obvious). Oh - I did like Will's remark about a lesbian vampire! It had just enough of a PC allusion to satisfy my snowflake leanings!

Giles and the new Giles comic. I'm intrigued (I seem to spend a lot of my time in this condition) about the connection between Watchers and Angels - for instance Herzog's exploration in Wings of Desire. There's a glorious drawing of Spike in S9 (when he leaves following the abortion story-line) that always evokes WoD.

Apologies if I've repeated this elsewhere - alternatively - just apologies! 🙂

Also - apologies for length and all the @s - it reads like a bloody Oscar acceptance speech!!
 
The Joanna Wise character I interpret as symbolic of the power of Fake News and Propaganda that has taken over the social and political conduct and manipulation of millions of people. Joanna Wise as t symbolic role model works with Politics & Societal Powers perspectives. In my opinion, without the political/social filters she comes out in the finale as little more than a plot point character and she makes a Lame Big Bad Resolution.

Contrast the finale to one, if not the most emotionally powerful character soldier Diaz, and Joanna Wise and the Jordan Slayer Thug Team fall so far short of "what could have been."


TriBel: The embryonic beginnings of that storyline were put down in S7. 7 alluded to new ways of thinking "otherness" that couldn't be sustained by available social formations. Its logic is traceable throughout the comics - through the shift (which started in 6/7) from humanism through the post/trans humanism of S9 etc.

Excellent Point – During WWII when the internment camps were used here in the USA they were against “the otherness/enemy” but the “otherness/enemy” was easily identifiable in our current era and societal upheaval the “otherness/enemy” is more about class and social status. The faces to fear are not only people, more importantly the “otherness/enemy” is technology and profits and capacity of the population to have equal access to economic power and class status. Today’s world, the easily recognized and easy to blame “face” is really a tool of FakeNews and political propaganda - The Press Secretary as you brilliantly state can be anyone – it’s the message/political talking point that matters. The Voice/Joanna Wise and her justification for taking control of Power being apply onto those people who feel they no longer matter or are at the mercy of the powerful PTB – it makes a great deal of sense to me. The treatment by CG suffered from lack of development but as symbolism, I think it does work. That it’s tools – i.e. magic and the weapons/canon that Buffy and Willow are unable defeat – aren’t those the elements, the unknown and technology that people want to fight or guard against? Great advances in technology have always been seen as magical and wondrous. Rounding Up and imprisonment of the supernatural and magical, as the New Face of the Current “otherness/enemy” makes a great substitute for our real world blaming of immigrants and political elites as the sources of the political and economic degradations.

I think that one of the big problems with how this season was good or failed is that the comic book format and the 12 issue limit worked against the development of this season – perhaps 15 issues would have been better. Probably would have. But I also have to say that by now, and mostly because Season 8 took so many years to complete, I really liked the choice of 12 issues – very much on the “kinda tired of comic books” now. If this story had been told in novel form and with real depth I think it would have been great.

I was totally excited about the political and societal themes that were introduced in this season – But I do agree with many of the points made in the vid interview. I wanted Jordan and her Slayer Guards which as I described as “Top Dogs and loving it” to have consequences for their choices and conduct. This resolution felt like looking at our American President Trump and his administration cronies and his comments regarding his being able to shoot someone and there would be no consequences – it would not matter.

Hope I made myself at least a little understood – I’m not much good as writing.

TriBel: I need to say a word about Angel 11 here (without turning it into the interminable Spuffy/Bangel debate). 😱 I don't read his situation as OOC nor as character assassination (I thought the same of Twilight). He's catholic isn't he? And he's been berating himself for goodness knows how many years about forgiveness?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Isn't this why he found his "perfect happiness" with Buffy - the mercy and grace of God and finding, if not forgiveness a chance to make up for his crimes and sin against the innocent Drusilla?
 
Last edited:
Isn't this why he found his "perfect happiness" with Buffy - the mercy and grace of God and finding, if not forgiveness a chance to make up for his crimes and sin against the innocent Drusilla?
Good post! Angel - I'm not sure (I've purposefully followed Spike's development in a way I haven't with Angel). I'd argue (and I'm much more secure in this) Spike's love for Buffy is a manifestation of his love/hatred for his own mother (the normal Oedipal Complex and abjection of the mother made more "complex" by the actual killing of his mother). The point with Spike is in LMPTM he comes through "therapy" with the knowledge that he did love his mother and she indeed loved him. As a result, he's able to forgive his mother and forgive himself and this, to my mind, allows him to finally reconcile his ambivalent feelings towards Buffy (love) and Slayer (hate). I think Angel needs to do something similar with his father. Is there (unconsciously) an elevation of the father to the level of a god? Is the manifestation of Angelus in response to this - a manifestation of the tyrannical avenging father (Didn't we see two gods fighting at the beginning of the season)? It seems to me that Angel needs to find a loving father/God (I'm vastly oversimplifying here). With all the conflation that's going on, this seems like the ideal opportunity. From this perspective, Twilight made perfect sense to me but twilight happens twice a day - light into darkness/darkness into light. Angel's done the first - is the second about to happen? With regard to Buffy - what initially attracted him to her?
 
Just finished the season!

Ok so my thoughts on the season as a whole :

I would lie if I said I didn't enjoy the season. It was set up really well, there were a lot of nice moments and most of the art was good. That said, I agree on pretty much everything idkmybffjill730 said : everything feels like it doesn't really matter and I am also annoyed at the way they used Faith, mostly in the last 3 issues.

My biggest problem though is that everything is solved and happens way too quickly. I know they only had 12 issues to set all of this up but I feel like they could have just had a smaller story and focus more on what's going on. It makes everything feel like it matters even less because the bad guys are always defeated so easily.

The whole thing is basically missing a bit of depth to me and feels a bit too sitcom-y/family friendly, where everyone gets along so well and everything turns out perfectly for everyone in the end. That's very far from the series and definitely doesn't help me take the comics as a continuation seriously.
 
The whole thing is basically missing a bit of depth to me and feels a bit too sitcom-y/family friendly, where everyone gets along so well and everything turns out perfectly for everyone in the end.

Yeah, the last scene looks like an episode of Friends.

BTW does anyone know how old Buffy is in Season 11?
 
Yeah, the last scene looks like an episode of Friends.

BTW does anyone know how old Buffy is in Season 11?

I'm thinking 27, but I'm not sure. The time frame of season 8 confuses the hell outta me.

Sierra Hahn (S8 editor): "Regarding Buffy and her age... We've sort of fudged the age thing a bit. Season Eight takes place a year or so after the end of the show, putting Buffy and her pals in their mid-20s. Vague? Yes. That's the answer/non-answer. We just refer to them as "twentysomethings.""

So... 😕
 
Thanks @Deniwizard - I also wonder if Season 11 is supposed to be a year like the other seasons or less than a year given the 12 issue/condensed Season.

I liked our TV Seasons because we always celebrated Buffy's birthday so we knew her age - now it's a big wonky.
 
In case there's anyone else who wants to see the final page...

GuGowXM.png


Yes, it's wonderful. But it's going to go to pieces sooner or later.

If this story was truly set in the present day, Buffy and Willow would be 36 years old. Xander would be 37. And Dawn would be at least 31 years old.
 
So here's my question... and I don't know if it's been asked or not. But when she gave back the Slayer power... she says, emphasis mine, "give it back, give it all back"
Could Willow have messed up and given ALL of the Slayer power back, ie took Buffy's power away?
 
So here's my question... and I don't know if it's been asked or not. But when she gave back the Slayer power... she says, emphasis mine, "give it back, give it all back"
Could Willow have messed up and given ALL of the Slayer power back, ie took Buffy's power away?

I think Buffy would have mentioned it if her power was gone. She didn't act like anything was wrong.
 
Mr. Pole: oh, so you think she could have felt it? I just thought that would be a real kicker!!

Yeah, the season seemed to establish that slayers, witches, etc., could immediately tell the difference when they no longer had their powers. I do think that could have been a cool twist, but since Buffy already dealt with losing her powers earlier in the season, I feel like they've probably told that story to the extent they wanted to.
 
Skanky Vamp
Skanky Vamp
oh, so you think she could have felt it? I just thought that would be a real kicker!!
Yes, it's wonderful. But it's going to go to pieces sooner or later.

If this story was truly set in the present day, Buffy and Willow would be 36 years old. Xander would be 37. And Dawn would be at least 31 years old.

Why is Xander a year older? They're all the same age.
 
So here's my question... and I don't know if it's been asked or not. But when she gave back the Slayer power... she says, emphasis mine, "give it back, give it all back"
Could Willow have messed up and given ALL of the Slayer power back, ie took Buffy's power away?
I think that could be a connection about season seven episode " "Same Time, Same Place" when Buffy offers her Slayer strength to Willow for a faster healing.... Or, maybe, in season nine when Severin touched Buffy trying to assorb all her power.... 🙂
 
I would lie if I said I didn't enjoy the season. It was set up really well, there were a lot of nice moments and most of the art was good. That said, I agree on pretty much everything idkmybffjill730 said : everything feels like it doesn't really matter and I am also annoyed at the way they used Faith, mostly in the last 3 issues.
I agree with him. It's just like "Well, what to do with Faith? Angel has this thing going on in the past, let's chuck Faith over to Buffy's world. What shall we do with her? Eh, she's there, people will be happy"
 
@Stoney I didn't think Rebekah gave much away, but I liked her answer to your question about the final panels of the season. I didn't realise that it was so finely planned and that she was actually told that one panel had Buffy 'setting down her plate'. I find details like that really interesting 🙂
 
Grace
Grace
That setting down her plate thing stuck out to me too!
I thought it was a nice to hear the implication that Joss is consulted on points through the season when she said that he gave the OK for Buffy's new hairstyle at the end. It could have been decided at the writers' summit of course, but I would imagine it is more likely that something that far off was a later consideration. How involved Joss is seems to always be a source of speculation and we mostly only know for sure he is involved in the initial plotting across the season, so an example of something that might have been taken to him and responded on at a later point gives an idea of how/when he might be called on for decisions at other points too perhaps. It also shows a degree of control and care that they wouldn't make a decision like that without his nod as well. 🙂
 
I thought it was a nice to hear the implication that Joss is consulted on points through the season when she said that he gave the OK for Buffy's new hairstyle at the end. It could have been decided at the writers' summit of course, but I would imagine it is more likely that something that far off was a later consideration. How involved Joss is seems to always be a source of speculation and we mostly only know for sure he is involved in the initial plotting across the season, so an example of something that might have been taken to him and responded on at a later point gives an idea of how/when he might be called on for decisions at other points too perhaps. It also shows a degree of control and care that they wouldn't make a decision like that without his nod as well. 🙂

Yes I always like to hear how Joss has been involved in the comics. Just the fact that he's at the writers summit at the start of every season makes me think he cares and takes a real interest in where the story is going and how the characters are changing. I hope he saw Buffy's new haircut as a nod towards punk = Spike 🙂
 
K
katmobile
I saw it more as kinda of symmetry in being battered and surviving. They're both half burnt but she has her hands i.e. had more agency
How involved Joss is seems to always be a source of speculation and we mostly only know for sure he is involved in the initial plotting across the season, so an example of something that might have been taken to him and responded on at a later point gives an idea of how/when he might be called on for decisions at other points too perhaps. It also shows a degree of control and care that they wouldn't make a decision like that without his nod as well. 🙂

I thought that was interesting too. I'm pretty sure SMG gets to sign off on new artists, right? I wonder to what degree she has to be consulted about changes to "her" likeness.
 
I thought that was interesting too. I'm pretty sure SMG gets to sign off on new artists, right? I wonder to what degree she has to be consulted about changes to "her" likeness.

I'm not sure how involved SMG gets by default with this kind of thing, but I think you're right that she has some degree of rights over how Buffy is presented. I'm sure I was told once that she could veto Buffy appearing in the more scantily clad, sexist/stereotypical comic styling for women. Not that it was being suggested that that was done with Buffy, but it is the kind of line that perhaps SMG can draw or has drawn. So perhaps comic artists being suggested are flagged up to her, I'm not sure.
 
Back
Top Bottom